$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$5

$2

$2

$3

$1

$2

$6

$3

$3

$4

$1

$5

$5

$2

$3

$16

$14

$12

$9

$3

$3

$10

$6

$20

$14

$6

$24

$20

$15

$10

$65

$58

$55

$49

Overspending at 1$

2.6

The Philadelphia Eagles select..

Chase Claypool, WR, Notre Dame

2.2

The Philadelphia Eagles select...

Michael Pittman, WR USC

1.6

The Philadelphia Eagles select, for the sixth pick of the 2020 NFL rookie draft...

Jerry "Best Route Runner In The League" Jeudy, WR Alabama

I agree with this, under Pitts proposal

I'm all for it

Agreed with Pitt

Agree

I would be okay eliminating Kickers and/or Defense if IDP was added...

Otherwise, disagree

Yes

I would agree to have negative points for incompletions IF AND ONLY IF we can make incompletions -0.5 and completions 1. My reasoning for this... incompletions, like Interceptions, are not at full fault of the QB. INTs typically provide -1 or -2 points because of this, to account for the Quarterback...

Yes and yes

As Is, Keeps It Shoulds You

Step 1: Remove Kickers
Step 2: Add Individual Defensive Player spot
Step 3: Profit

Otherwise... I disagree

That does seem like a bit of unnecessary work... If the commish is okay with it, im okay with it. But I'm leaning towards a disagree. I'll abstain until the cowgirls gives her feedback

Agreed

I agree with this

I'd actually agree on this topic, but for a min salary cap limit of 200, I believe any team that goes under 1/3 of their budget may be severely handicapping their team for next year, especially if the owner does not return.

Agreed to capping 4 1sts, no cap afterwards

Sure?...

I would propose the max acquisition for team budget to change from 50 to 20 or 25. 50 bucks is almost a 15% increase in salary. I think an 8 to 10 percent max increase is more reasonable.

Agreed with Cardinals, no unless TD scoring is boosted

I agree for this, nice proposal

I abstain

Agreed

I disagree, but I'd also like to possibly propose a change to the amount a team can acquire from other teams from 50 to 20 or 25. 50 bucks seems a bit high to be able to use as an advantage against other teams. It's what, an almost 15% increase in salary. I think an 8 to 10 percent max increase is m...

Against

I'd agree if it was 2 or 3 bucks per franchise owner, nothing more than 5 bucks.

Strongly disagree with having more roster spots in a very shallow existing player pool post-draft/auction.

I agree on Conference Record

Not a fan, to be honest.

4.14 Pick - Eagles Select

Kalan Higdon, RB - Texanx

For the sleepy 4.11 pick of the NFL draft, Philadelphia Eagles select Jets punt returner and future slot ppr machine...

Greg Dortch - WR, NYJ

The Philadelphia Eagles will select with the 4.4 pick...

Rodney Anderson - RB, Bengals

With the 3.11 Pick, Philadelphia Eagles Select...

Gary Jennings, WR of the Seattle Seahawks

With the 2.16 Pick of the NFC Draft, the Philadelphia Eagles will select the 2019 Darren Spro... I mean...

Kansas City Chiefs RB - Darwin Thompson

With the 11th pick of the 2019 NFC Draft, the last years Wildcard Winning, Dallas Dominating, Giant killing Philadelphia Eagles will draft one of their own... congratulations to the future of Eagles Recievers... J.J. Arcega-Whiteside aka JAWS https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1138172868079050754/...

$3

$2

$2

$3

$17

$8

$6

$15

4

$10

$4

$8

5

$2

$3

6

I like the idea combined with above, but for a much smaller amount. It will build for years, i dont think we want to have almost over a thousand dollars in holding if it gets to that point

I vote yes for 2021 season

I agree on a soft limit of 300 for offseason deadlines and reacquisition with the hard limit of 350, so you can acquire 50 in faab but no more

I agree

I vote against it, they are still relevant in dynasty deep leagues... I can see how they are unneeded in 10-12 team leagues but I strategized to spend money on K/DEF and the difference is noticeable. Yes, it's a bit more random, but maybe instead of eliminating them we adjust the scoring to make the...

I think the gradual 5 to 1 amount change makes more sense than a 10 to 1. When you have a stud talent like Saquon, the 10 makes sense but like this draft, Jacobs for a 10 doesn't seem that reasonable, or anybody that comes after him.

I'd vote yes