$1

$1

$1

$1

$1

$7

$5

$3

$1

$3

$8

$1

$3

$5

$17

$15

$10

$1

$5

$2

$21

$9

$5

$7

$5

$30

$28

$3

$7

$3

$5

$18

$16

$25

$5

$14

$11

$18

$17

$9

$50

$55

$53

$10

$7

$46

$5

$15

$12

$14

$41

$36

$31

$60

$43

$12

$22

$40

$11

$32

$27

$10

$20

$21

$20

$10

1.1 Clyde Edwards-Helaire RB KC

I have a harder time understanding why only a handful of people out of 32 share their opinion on rule changes that affects their league. I am going to bed before I get all worked up again.

Such a dumb argument. RB and WR scoring are comparable, QB scoring is not. Keep trying Luke.

Also, people are growing fed up with all of this change. We all agreed to join this league knowing it wasn't a superflex. We could have waited for another opportunity to come around.

I am voting no on every single one of these late proposals.

You can't do superflex with 16 teams.

I tend to agree with Saints. I also think it helps to level the playing field for pocket passers in today's NFL of scrambling QBs.

Although, increasing passing TDs to 5 or 6 points would accomplish that too.

Chiefs would most likely not win Chase. He doesn't have the cap space because he is a good team. If he wanted to start whacking pieces from his championship team to clear space for Chase, then he should be allowed to do that. Chances are he is no longer going to be a championship caliber team. I don...

Terrible example. QB scoring is higher than RB scoring. RB and WR scoring is comparable in .75 ppr scoring. I don't understand why you think everyone would be wanting to try to start 4 RBs I haven't made up my mind on this yet but I don't buy into the fact that it changes RB value. I think everyone ...

What if I own someone else's 2021 pick? I goes by the owner of the 2021 pick correct? What if I already traded someone else's 2021 1stbthis offseason (NYJ) because this rule didn't exist, and that team wins the lottery for the 1st pick? Is that fair? In my opinion, free agent bidding is the most fai...

When you put it like that, it makes me against. I don't want to do anything to hinder your ability to remove casual owners. I think a committee of yourself, 2 NFC owners, and 2 AFC owners should be formed. Hold committee discussions and a vote to remove owners. Make it have to be unanimous 5-0 to ha...

Also, the Bengals would be starting James Conner in the new flex. I would be starting Guice or Shepherd. Those players do not have zero point floors.

Not sure why flex160 is relevant. If this were to pass, you would be starting a combination of 8 RB/WR/TE so it seems like flex128 would be more relevant.

Not disagreeing with your logic just didn't understand flex160

Could we have a committee?

Option 1 is a lot to do about nothing. This almost never happens.

Throw them into free agency and let the fiscally responsible teams sign them.

Beau, read the last paragraph that James typed. This helps the commissioner not have the sole burden of removing an owner. This is more to about relieving the burden of the commish than it is about removing teams.

I didn't think of that Beau, but the structure is flawed.

Let's reward the regular season champs if you don't want to reward the playoff champ.

I am against this one. I feel like if you beat 31 other teams, you should be walking away with at least half of the entry fees. If my math is correct, under the proposed changes, the maximum you can win is $1350 instead of $1500. I would rather see the extra money go to the regular season champ who ...

I see where you are coming from Philly, but I operated under $200 the entire offseason and season and made the playoffs. It can be done.

Also, let it be known that this change would negatively impact me more than anyone else. I just traded Lamar Jackson because the QB bonuses are so high and I am about to draft two stud RBs because the bonuses are too low. I am proposing this because in my opinion it's the correct thing to do for the...

RB: 1st bonus – Tier 1 ($10), Tier 2 ($7), Tier 3 ($3) 2nd bonus - Tier 1 ($12), Tier 2 ($9), Tier 3 ($4) 3rd bonus - Tier 1 ($15), Tier 2 ($11), Tier 3 ($5) 4th bonus - Tier 1 ($20), Tier 2 ($14), Tier 3 ($7) 5th+ bonus - Tier 1 ($25), Tier 2 ($18), Tier 3 ($9) WR: 1st bonus – Tier 1 ($8), Tier 2 (...

So I have put some thought into these. The more i looked at them, the more flaws i found. I believe James was not the creator of these but borrowed them, so I don't feel terrible about critiquing them. For example, the current Tier 3 bonus for QBs jumps by $2 from 1st bonus to 2nd bonus, then by $3 ...

So the new tiers would be as follows: RB: 1st bonus – Tier 1 ($10), Tier 2 ($6), Tier 3 ($3), Tier 4 (no increase) 2nd bonus - Tier 1 ($14), Tier 2 ($8), Tier 3 ($5), Tier 4 (no increase) 3rd bonus - Tier 1 ($18), Tier 2 ($12), Tier 3 ($8), Tier 4 (no increase) 4th bonus - Tier 1 ($24), Tier 2 ($15)...

Make the current QB bonus structure the new RB bonus structure

Make the current RB bonus structure the new WR bonus structure

Make the current WR bonus structure the new QB bonus structure

I think a good compromise here is a 50% cap penalty if cut after the first season. So James would have had to pay $60 in cap penalties this year for not keeping Cook and his $120 salary. I think that accomplishes what we are after here. There's no way Cook goes for $120 if you know you are going to ...

This is the hill I want to die on!

I will sell you my vote on any other topic in exchange for a YES vote on 2 year contracts.

I fucking love it Seahawks!

I am all for it.

Based on the responses in the draft lottery proposal, I think this also helps by adding another playoff team and removing a team that shouldn't get the 1st pick from.the lottery.

It's a win win

Josh, I could get on board with this if the cap penalty was 50%. So I bid $40 on Brees and win. If I cut him after year one, I take a $20 cap hit the following year. If I cut him after year two or later, there is no cap penalty. Bonuses apply as usual. Is that the compromise you have in mind? Is tha...

I tend to agree with Luke on this one. The more tougher decisions, the better.

Josh, I think you bake the retirement risk into your bid. So you bid $15 rather than $25 on Brady or Brees for fear of their retirement. Or you can stay away. Or you can try to trade them away and get someone to eat the contract as part of another deal. This should be a thinking man's game. I am all...

I think this change would ensure that.

I think players signed to two year contracts should not be eligible for bonuses. That would help with a little bit of the uncertainty. As for other players on your roster getting bonuses forcing you over the cap, you already know that every year you are going to have players getting bonuses, especia...

I believe that whomever owns the 1st round pick should set the lineup. However, if we move to a lottery system I am not sure it will matter as much.

I like the idea of having some conference pride.