5

$1

$1

$2

63

6

13

43

10

66

8

41

6

61

39

58

36

90

4

81

2

56

61

34

54

25

79

23

52

76

19

21

48

56

74

71

54

32

30

19

28

15

26

68

52

16

12

11

24

22

11

50

13

29

45

40

20

35

11

26

50

$10

CLE having problems logging in and asked me to submit selection.

With 3.7, CLE selects Hunter Bryant, DET

2.13 Jalen Hurts, QB, PHI

TRADE

NYJ acquire pick 2.13
CIN acquire picks 3.9, 2021 3rd

Darrynton Evans, RB, TEN

2.9 Brandon Aiyuk, WR, SF

2.1 Jalen Reagor, WR, PHI

1.13 Henry Ruggs, WR, LVR

1.9 Denzel Mims, WR

1.3 D’andre Swift, RB, DET

The NFL awards comp picks because a player chooses to leave that team for a better deal. Teams don’t get comp picks for releasing a player. You cut a player bc you can’t afford him. If a player is fair or undervalue, you’ll probably still keep him. If a player is overpaid, now you can release him an...

I’m certainly in favor of removing that burden, Ben. Will think about how it might be structured to accomplish that. As I said, I just don’t think this will actually do that. If there are 3 managers of interest, all get 5 votes (that’s generous to assume 3 being so obvious), none come close to the 1...

Flex160 last year was Gerald Everett. That’s TE26 being a starter in week 1. Even before byes weeks and injuries this position will be boom/bust players with 0 point floors. By way of example, Everett had 4 weeks over 12 points and 9 under 4.5. Rather than introducing additional skill or depth, in a...

Feels unnecessary and like it has some execution flaws. Doesn’t really change anything so I’m kind of indifferent. I’ll vote against because it just introduces another vote and process to be managed that I don’t think will achieve anything.

I am also against this proposal: It seems unfair that because the best team advances to the divisional round by bye instead of WC round, their payout is less. The best team should get the most opportunity for the most payout. Here is a likely scenario: Top team gets bye ($100 for division) Second se...

I like the idea, but just want to know how we can be sure a team will be able to stay under the salary cap. Say they have 10 players at an average of $25 each going into their second year... those players get $60 in bonuses applied to them as a whole. How does that team get their cap back below $300...

Definitely for removing the cap on rounds 2-4. Don’t yet have a view on the adjustment to the first round cap.

In favor. For the same reasoning as I’m in favor of interceptions being more punitive. Rebalances QB scoring closer to their actual performance.

I’m for this. More fairly rewards defenses for making plays that are outside of the current narrow set of stats for which defense scoring is currently based.

Why artificially reduce our flexibility to make improvements to the rules?

I support this. As per Ben’s statement... I already agreed in principle to trade away Winston... hahaha. But in all seriousness, you could add this for implementation in a few years and I think it would be a positive change for rebalancing QBs by their actual performance. Jameis is a great example o...

3.4 Ryquell Armstead

3.3 Jace Sternberger

2.7 Dwayne Haskins

2.1 J.J. Arcega-Whiteside

1.11 TJ Hockenson

15 hours since pick 1.6 so provisionally making a seleciton pending Jame's review...

1.8 A.J. Brown

Josh Jacobs, RB, OAK

5

3

3

1

1

5

7

29

4

3

27