Flex???

[Seahawks]

Curious why RB is not a flex option. With 16 teams and 24 man rosters it's going tough to fill flex positions
with competitive players.

[Commissioner]

I left it as WR/TE because in the league I just played in this is what we did and it worked out fine, but it was a setting I was going to discuss once we got the league full. Basically we'll have three options.

1. No flex at all and just go QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, WR, TE, DEF, K.

2. WR/TE flex

3. WR / RB / TE flex

I like having a flex because it let's people be a bit more creative with their roster and forces you to manage your depth better. But if guys wanted to drop it, I would be fine with that too.

[Lmowers]

I personally am for either choice 1 or 3

[Ragnark78]

1 or 3 works for me also

[Commissioner]

yeah we'll go with WR / RB / TE flex.

Gives managers more flexibility to be creative with roster control. More decisions to make.

[Washington Redskins]

I agree, I like the full flex

[Jash13]

agree with having the flex as well

[Bills - Trent]

I like option 3

[Alex Saints]

Option 3 for me as well

[Commissioner]

Yeah I went with Option 3. It's been updated in the CBA.

Link: viewtopic.php?f=39&t=6

[Taxman14]

Option 3